Investigation Services by 4RIIS

A First for National Logistics Firm: Successfully conducted the first-ever civil recovery case for our national logistics company following an internal theft investigation related to an employee theft incident. Led the initial case compilation, which was crucial for evidence gathering and formed the foundation for legal proceedings. Subsequently, we appointed a solicitor who instructed a direct access barrister to provide criminal prosecution support. This collaborative approach resulted in a favourable outcome, marking a landmark success and establishing a precedent within the organisation for civil recovery in cases of employee theft.

Theft of Jewellery – Logistics Chain Breach

Background:

A theft involving nearly £20,000 worth of jewellery occurred while the goods were under the control of a third-party logistics company. An internal theft investigation led to the identification of a likely offender, prompting the development of a civil recovery case to support criminal prosecution.

Initial Police Response:

Initially, police misconduct proceedings led to a decision not to proceed with the case, citing a perceived lack of evidence. Through persistence and repeated engagement, including the provision of additional clarification and evidence gathering, the case was eventually accepted.

Outcome:

The suspect was formally charged, and the case proceeded to Crown Court. A conviction was secured, resulting in a successful conclusion to what was initially considered a low-viability case.

Case Support for Civil Recovery Case Against Solicitor Practice

Under the instruction of the direct access barrister, we conducted a thorough review of a substantial volume of material over multiple years, including correspondence, bank statements, and invoices. This evidence gathering process allowed us to compile a detailed draft statement and assemble relevant exhibits. This information formed the evidential basis used by counsel to successfully secure an out-of-court settlement in a civil recovery case exceeding £250,000 against a solicitor practice. The claim related to a failure to provide appropriate advice on an international money transfer, which was ultimately seized by a bank due to its connection with a sanctioned entity. The job remained ongoing for several years, involving continuous document review and case support, which could also serve as vital support in any potential criminal prosecution proceedings related to internal theft investigations or police misconduct.

Response to Personal Injury Claim – Dog Bite Incident

Under the instruction of the solicitor acting on behalf of the Respondent, witness interviews were conducted relevant to the civil recovery case arising from the dog bite incident. These witnesses had previously been interviewed by the police in relation to the associated criminal prosecution support for the criminal charges.

During the course of these interviews, several discrepancies were identified between the witness accounts given to the police and their statements provided during this civil investigation. These inconsistencies proved to be materially helpful in evidence gathering and assessing the strength of the civil claim.

The evidence gathered, including the contradictions noted, contributed significantly to the negotiation process, ultimately facilitating an out-of-court settlement between the parties involved.

Suspect on conditional bail Under the instruction of a public access barrister (authorised to conduct litigation), a comprehensive 17-hour interview was conducted with the suspect over multiple sessions while they were on bail for serious allegations, including rape, assault, and controlling and coercive behaviour. This process was carried out under the supervision of a direct access barrister authorised to oversee the proceedings, ensuring compliance with legal standards which may also apply to civil recovery cases. The aim was to meticulously review all evidence gathered— including what the suspect had previously disclosed in their initial police interview— thereby allowing the barrister to provide informed legal advice and prepare adequately for the next police interview, which is crucial in the context of criminal prosecution support and potential police misconduct proceedings.

Family - Child Contact Order

As a litigant in person navigating a civil recovery case, I gained valuable experience in evidence gathering related to a family law matter concerning a child contact order. 

I compiled comprehensive logs of contact, collected relevant correspondence, and obtained employee information. Additionally, I gathered material that undermines the opposing party’s case, which is crucial in both family law disputes and internal theft investigations. This experience also provided insights that could support criminal prosecution proceedings and address any police misconduct proceedings that may arise.

Extensive experience in UK policing includes leading hundreds of investigations from initial report through to resolution, managing a wide range of offences such as theft, assault, public order offences, domestic abuse, drink/drug driving, and drug-related crimes. This experience also encompasses civil recovery cases and criminal prosecution support, ensuring that all aspects of investigations are thorough and effective. 

My work consistently delivered positive outcomes—both in court, through securing convictions, and out of court via cautions, community resolutions, and restorative justice measures. I took responsibility for evidence gathering and preserving evidence, conducting interviews under PACE, and preparing comprehensive case files. Additionally, I liaised closely with the CPS and partner agencies to ensure cases met evidential thresholds and remained victim-focused, including during internal theft investigations and police misconduct proceedings. 

My attention to detail, methodical approach, and strong communication with victims, witnesses, and suspects played a key role in achieving a high rate of successful case disposals.

Litigant in person experience in police misconduct proceedings has been crucial in the context of a civil recovery case. This process involved the compilation of comprehensive statements supported by a substantial volume of exhibits. These exhibits included historic personal development logs, commendation and good work reports, personal references, examination results, and evidence gathering that highlighted instances of unfair treatment—such as comparable conduct by others that went unreported or unchallenged. Furthermore, the identification of detailed contact logs, relevant correspondence, and employee information was essential in the internal theft investigation, as well as sourcing material that undermined the opposing party’s case in criminal prosecution support. This evidence was strategically assembled to ensure a fair and balanced evaluation of the facts and to support the position with clarity and credibility.

Extensive handling of executive and board-level complaints has involved direct engagement with complainants to gather full details and supporting evidence, including evidence gathering for civil recovery cases. This process includes conducting internal interviews and managing sensitive matters that overlapped with ongoing police misconduct proceedings, ensuring those investigations received appropriate primacy. 

In cases where complaints involved subcontractors, outcomes were ensured to be consistent with contractual obligations and work agreements, particularly in the context of internal theft investigations. 

For internal staff matters, formal investigation procedures were followed, and where necessary, cases were progressed to disciplinary hearings in consultation with HR. This approach also involved close collaboration with legal services departments to assess and mitigate organisational risk—such as potential claims of discrimination—and to facilitate early dispute resolution where appropriate, including providing criminal prosecution support when needed. 

This work has encompassed supporting the implementation of pre-action protocols and contributing to case preparation for potential litigation.

Successful Action against Police. 

Experienced in compiling comprehensive case files for Letters Before Action relating to alleged breaches of police powers, including unlawful arrest, unlawful detention, and unlawful bail. This process is essential in civil recovery cases as it involves evidence gathering that systematically identifies and obtains all relevant material—such as custody records, officers’ pocket notebooks, incident logs, body-worn video footage, witness statements, risk assessments, and original allegations. This thorough approach ensures a robust evidential foundation for pre-action correspondence and potential litigation, particularly in police misconduct proceedings. With a proven track record of providing criminal prosecution support, I have successfully secured out-of-court settlements by evidencing unlawful conduct and presenting cases with clarity and credibility.

Not guilty verdict for a charge of common assault in the Magistrates' Court. 

Working knowledge of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) and the Criminal Procedure Rules was developed through direct experience in managing pre-trial preparation and disclosure, particularly in civil recovery cases and criminal prosecution support. 

Responsibilities included critically reviewing disclosed material—such as police interviews, CCTV footage, and witness statements—to identify inconsistencies, omissions, and evidential gaps, which are crucial in evidence gathering for internal theft investigations. 

The matter was referred to a public access barrister, contributing to the drafting of a legally compliant defence statement. The barrister liaised directly with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and conducted courtroom advocacy. Throughout the proceedings, careful case management helped ensure procedural fairness and evidential integrity, ultimately resulting in an acquittal amidst police misconduct proceedings.

 Prepare detailed indemnity and liability statements for insurance companies by conducting comprehensive interviews with policyholders, claimants, and witnesses. 

Gather and analyse all relevant documentation, including locus reports, police information, legal correspondence, personal injury evidence, theft reports, and driving offence records. Investigate complex claims involving uninsured drivers, individuals without valid driving licences, failure to stop incidents, and other traffic-related offences. 

Liaise effectively with police forces, legal representatives, insurers, and third parties, identify and interview additional witnesses, conduct internet-based investigations, and ensure all appropriate data-sharing mandates and authorities are obtained. 

Through thorough investigation and evidence gathering, successfully identified fraudulent insurance claims, leading to claims being repudiated, policies being invalidated, and insurance contracts being terminated.