Investigation Services by 4RIIS

---

 A First for National Logistics Firm:

Successfully conducted the first-ever civil recovery case for our national logistics company following an internal theft incident. 

Led initial case compilation, which formed the foundation for legal proceedings. Subsequently appointed a solicitor who instructed a direct access barrister. 

This collaborative approach resulted in a favourable outcome, marking a landmark success and establishing a precedent within the organisation for civil recovery in cases of employee theft.

  Theft of Jewellery – Logistics Chain Breach

Background:
A theft involving nearly £20,000 worth of jewellery occurred while the goods were under the control of a third-party logistics company. Internal investigations identified a likely offender, prompting a detailed case to be built to support criminal prosecution.

Initial Police Response:
At first, police declined to proceed with the case, citing a perceived lack of evidence. Through persistence and repeated engagement, including provision of additional clarification and evidentiary context, the case was eventually accepted.

Outcome:
The suspect was formally charged and the case proceeded to Crown Court. A conviction was secured, resulting in a successful conclusion to what was initially considered a low-viability case

  Case Support for Civil Claim Against Solicitor Practice

Under the instruction of the direct access barrister, we conducted a thorough review of a substantial volume of material over multiple years, including correspondence, bank statements, and invoices. We compiled a detailed draft statement and assembled relevant exhibits. This information formed the evidential basis used by counsel to successfully secure an out-of-court settlement in a civil claim exceeding £250,000 against a solicitor practice. The claim related to a failure to provide appropriate advice on an international money transfer, which was ultimately seized by a bank due to its connection with a sanctioned entity. The job remained ongoing for several years, involving continuous document review and case support.

  Response to Personal Injury Claim – Dog Bite Incident

Under the instruction of the solicitor acting on behalf of the Respondent,  conducted witness interviews relevant to the personal injury claim arising from the dog bite incident. These witnesses had previously been interviewed by the police in relation to the associated criminal charges.

During the course of these interviews, several discrepancies were identified between the witness accounts given to the police and their statements provided during this civil investigation. These inconsistencies proved to be materially helpful in assessing the strength of the civil claim.

The evidence gathered, including the contradictions noted, contributed significantly to the negotiation process, ultimately facilitating an out-of-court settlement between the parties involved.

  Suspect on conditional bail

Under the instruction of  a public access barrister (authorised to conduct litigation) conducted a 17-hour interview with the suspect, over multiple sessions, while they were on bail for allegations including rape, assault, and controlling and coercive behaviour. 

This process was carried out under the supervision of a direct access barrister authorised to oversee the proceedings. 

The purpose was to ensure that all information— including what the suspect had previously disclosed in their initial police interview— was fully reviewed with the barrister, allowing them to provide informed legal advice and to prepare for the next police interview.

Family - Child Contact Order  

litigant in person experience with evidence gathering in a family law matter concerning a child contact order. 

Compiled comprehensive logs of contact, collected relevant correspondence, obtained employee information, and gathered material that undermines the opposing party’s case.

   Extensive experience in UK policing.

 leading hundreds of investigations from initial report through to resolution, managing a wide range of offences including theft, assault, public order offences, domestic abuse, drink/drug driving and drug-related crimes. 

Work consistently delivered positive outcomes—both in court, through securing convictions, and out of court via cautions, community resolutions, and restorative justice measures.

 Responsibility for gathering and preserving evidence, conducting interviews under PACE, preparing comprehensive case files, and liaising closely with the CPS and partner agencies to ensure cases met evidential thresholds and remained victim-focused. 

Attention to detail, methodical approach, and strong communication with victims, witnesses, and suspects played a key role in achieving a high rate of successful case disposals.

  Litigant in person experience in police misconduct proceedings.

Compilation of comprehensive statements supported by a substantial volume of exhibits.

 These included historic personal development logs, commendation and good work reports, personal references, examination results, and evidence highlighting instances of unfair treatment—such as comparable conduct by others that went unreported or unchallenged. Additionally, the identification of detailed contact logs, gathered relevant correspondence, obtained employee information, and sourced material that undermined the opposing party’s case. 

This evidence was strategically assembled to ensure a fair and balanced evaluation of the facts and to support the position with clarity and credibility. 

 Extensive handling executive and board-level complaints. 

This includes direct engagement with complainants to gather full details and supporting evidence, conducting internal interviews, and managing sensitive matters that overlapped with ongoing police investigations—ensuring those investigations were given appropriate primacy.

Where complaints involved subcontractors.

ensuring outcomes were consistent with contractual obligations and work agreements. 

For internal staff matters,  the following of formal investigation procedures and, where necessary, progressed cases to disciplinary hearings in consultation with HR.

Working closely with legal services departments to assess and mitigate organisational risk—such as potential claims of discrimination—and to facilitate early dispute resolution where appropriate. 

This has included supporting the implementation of pre-action protocols and contributing to case preparation for potential litigation.

 Successful Action against Police.

 Experienced in compiling comprehensive case files for Letters Before Action relating to alleged breaches of police powers, including unlawful arrest, unlawful detention, and unlawful bail.

 This involves systematically identifying and obtaining all relevant material—such as custody records, officers’ pocket notebooks, incident logs, body-worn video footage, witness statements, risk assessments, and original allegations—to ensure a robust evidential foundation for pre-action correspondence and potential litigation. Proven track record of securing out-of-court settlements by evidencing unlawful conduct and presenting cases with clarity and credibility. 

  Not guilty verdict for a charge of common assault in the Magistrates' Court.

Working knowledge of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) and the Criminal Procedure Rules, developed through direct experience in managing pre-trial preparation and disclosure.

 Responsibilities included critically reviewing disclosed material—such as police interviews, CCTV footage, and witness statements—to identify inconsistencies, omissions, and evidential gaps.

  matter referred to a public access barrister, contributing to the drafting of a legally compliant defence statement.

The barrister liaised directly with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and conducted courtroom advocacy. Throughout the proceedings, careful case management helped ensure procedural fairness and evidential integrity, ultimately resulting in an acquittal.